[db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed May 25 21:00:49 CEST 2022
Personally, I think that we should write e-mail into the policy as I do think requiring a policy change to change this is reasonable given how I don't see this changing in the foreseeable future. Sure it might be different in 10 years, but maybe we can be ok with needing to use the PDP if/when that occurs. -Cynthia On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:58 PM denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Leo > > On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 20:28, Leo Vegoda via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:04 AM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > > > > > > I forgot to mention this > > > > > > > [...], why should we dictate what the mandatory technology is? > > > > > > I kinda agree with you here if you by "we" mean the db-wg, this might be a larger question that should involve multiple other working groups too. But the RIPE community should decide this imo. > > > > I think that the reason phone was mandatory is that it was the > > de-facto standard. I agree that e-mail is now. But will it remain so? > > If we are building for the future then we should consider the > > possibility that the future will look different from today. > > The policy proposal relates to today and going forwards. We can't > guess what tech will be the most widely used tomorrow. So either we > write email into the policy today and change the policy if and when > that changes, or we write into the policy something like "One > mandatory means of contact must be defined in the ROLE object. This > one method will be determined by RIPE community consensus and may be > changed in the future if the community consensus prefers an > alternative method." The wording is a bit clumsy but more generalised > and allows changes to the contact method without a policy update. > > cheers > denis > proposal author > > > > > Regards, > > > > Leo > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]