[db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed May 25 20:58:41 CEST 2022
Hi, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:28 PM Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:04 AM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > > > > I forgot to mention this > > > > > [...], why should we dictate what the mandatory technology is? > > > > I kinda agree with you here if you by "we" mean the db-wg, this might be a larger question that should involve multiple other working groups too. But the RIPE community should decide this imo. > > I think that the reason phone was mandatory is that it was the > de-facto standard. I agree that e-mail is now. But will it remain so? > If we are building for the future then we should consider the > possibility that the future will look different from today. It might not remain the standard but I also don't think it makes sense to plan for the future too much here as it is a relatively simple thing to change in the future if/when that happens. Yes we can consider the possibility but I don't think it really changes anything for what we do right now given how minimal it really is in terms of change. -Cynthia
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]