[db-wg] Protecting References to Objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Protecting References to Objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE NCC Open House: Feedback on our Unified User Interface
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Edward Shryane
eshryane at ripe.net
Tue Mar 29 15:23:01 CEST 2022
Hi Cynthia, Thanks for your feedback, > On 29 Mar 2022, at 03:08, Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > > Hi Ed, > > I might be misunderstanding but mnt-ref on mntners sounds like a catch 22. > > If mnt-ref would only be needed for mnt-by and any other references to mntners except mnt-ref I suppose it would be fine. We can authorise "mnt-ref:" in the same way as the other "mnt" attributes: - If the referenced mntner itself has an "mnt-ref:" attribute, then the update needs to be authenticated by that mntner. - If the refereneced mntner does not have an "mnt-ref:" attribute, then the reference is allowed. A self-referencing "mnt-ref:" attribute is possible (i.e. a reference to a mntner needs to be authenticated by that mntner). Do I understand your concern correctly? > But generally speaking here I think I support it for the object types excluding mntners but only if no mnt-ref attribute means that anyone can reference it. (the way it is today) > > This would mean that it's an opt-in functionality that requires adding at least one mnt-ref attribute to the object. > > I think the impact would be too big and uncertain otherwise. > I agree! The "mnt-ref:" attribute should be optional on the other object types (it's mandatory on organisation objects). Regards Ed > -Cynthia >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Protecting References to Objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE NCC Open House: Feedback on our Unified User Interface
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]