[db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation

Hi Janos.

 > Generally speaking it is a good idea to avoid using the comment character (#) in the
 > attribute fields (descr in this case), unless you use it for a comment indeed.
 >
 > In your example I have the impression that # is intended to stand for "number".

it is indeed a "number" prefix but I am of course aware that in general everything behind 
a # comment sign could potentially get lost.

@Ed: If this were a comment (it is not here but what was I thinking to use the # for 
anything else :-D) wouldn't this still be something someone could want to update? Let's 
say a peer's name in an aut-num object or similar? I would have expected that also 
comments should get the chance to be updated.

Not a big issue of course but still wondering why it was implemented that way.

Thank you and best regards
Sascha