[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2022-01

In message <CAKvLzuHjvzMjV8uT0nvv_ocL2h-uF49uNwTdAJDRvDpJabfqdA at mail.gmail.com>
denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> wrote:

>Yes Carlos you are absolutely right. There is no suggestion whatsoever that
>any membership will be revoked or any resources de-registered if any
>verification fails.

What then is the enforcement mechanism that underpins sections 4.0, 5.0, and
6.0 of your proposal then?  Foul language?

If recalcitrant members continue to put bogus garbage into their WHOIS
records, then what happens?  Will NCC step in, take control of the relevant
WHOIS record(s) and insert correct information taken from the member's original
bona fide documents that the member submitted when the member joined RIPE?

You can't have it both ways.  You can't make it a matter of formal policy
that names, street addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses will
henceforth have to be "verified" without explaining who is going to do
this, when it is going to be done, what exactly qualifies as "verified",
and what you believe will happen or should happen if it -isn't- done.


Regards,
rfg