[db-wg] rfc2770

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Havard Eidnes he at uninett.no
Thu Jun 2 21:00:46 CEST 2022

> Sure, I know this. Now there is a global lack of IPv4 address space,
> so things can be changed. I would like to try. And may be to push some
> things globally.
>
> I do not know any example of 233 net usage like it was designed. Are
> there any?

Yes, there are.

If you want to re-assign 233/8 to unicast usage, I suggest this
be done the proper way (through the IETF and IANA), not just by
sqatting on it with a different type of usage and trying to
intimidate others to dance to your pipe.

Regards,

- Håvard

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]