[db-wg] rfc2770
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu Jun 2 16:08:36 CEST 2022
Sure, I know this. Now there is a global lack of IPv4 address space, so things can be changed. I would like to try. And may be to push some things globally. I do not know any example of 233 net usage like it was designed. Are there any? 02.06.22 16:59, Gert Doering via db-wg пише: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:55:12PM +0300, Max Tulyev via db-wg wrote: >> May be you know, if you have a 16-bit ASN, you have a /24 IPv4 network >> reserved for you for multicast purposes. It is >> 233.asnum-hi-octets.asnum-lo-octets.0/24: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2770 >> >> My ASN is 29632, so the prefix is 233.115.192.0/24 >> >> I would like to start using it (well, for testing purposes now). To do >> so, I need a route object in the RIPE database. > > Multicast networks are not announced in BGP, so, why do you need a route: > object for? > > (These addresses must never be used as a source IP, and for destination > resolution, a multicast tree needs to be built by MP-BGP, MSDP, PIM) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]