[db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Thu Jul 28 22:44:08 CEST 2022
Hi Ronald, I do not think that this is the issue here and I think I probably agree with you and most others on the db-wg when it comes to geofeed. I think this is possibly at least in part a misunderstanding between the db-wg/db team and the ncc legal team. The purposes could change to include geodata if there is consensus to do that, but that is not the stage we are at currently. -Cynthia On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:39 PM Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > It is apparent to me that I shall long regret having been too busy over the > past 2.5 years, just trying to survive the global pandemic, to have involved > myself with the formulation of the legislation which the RIPE Database > Requirements Task Force has now, apparently, set in stone. > > At this point I guess it is all I can do to ask whether or not biographical > sketches of the six task force members listed here: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/rdb-requirements-tf > > are available online anywhere. > > I am most particularly keen to know how many, if any of them, could be > fairly said to have represented the interests of either law enforcement > or transparency advocates. > > > Regards, > rfg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]