[db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 22:43:35 CEST 2022
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 21:50, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34 PM denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > I think you are arguing here for deleting assignments...that is > > another discussion... > > I'm not arguing for deleting anything. > > People have stated that they need to register an assignment which is > an exact duplicate of the allocation. The only difference would be the > value of the status attribute. I don't understand why they need to > register an exact match assignment. Why do they need to register this > assignment? Why can the allocation not be left as it is and assumed to > be used by the organisation holding it? > > What am I missing? What you are missing is that many, many, many of these /24 allocations are not being used by the resource holder';s organisation. They are assigned to end users. cheers denis co-chair DB-WG > > Thanks, > > Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]