[db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash.naderpour at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 18:44:31 CEST 2022
Hi Denis, That would be great to have a way to assign a whole allocation without splitting it to smaller assignments. I support the idea of having a new status value. Regards, Arash Naderpour On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:39 PM denis walker via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Colleagues > > For many years people have been asking for a way to assign a whole > allocation without having to create 2 smaller assignments. The > situation is more relevant now with so many /24 allocations. After the > RIPE NCC rejected the idea of a dual primary key, for technical > reasons, there were two options on the table. Making the "status:" > attribute multiple or creating a new status value 'ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED > PA'. No one has objected to either of these options. The co-chairs > therefore recommend the option put forward by the RIPE NCC to add a > new status value 'ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED PA'. Of the two options, this is > probably the simplest and likely to cause less problems with user's > scripts that parse objects. > > If there are no objections to this, the co-chairs now ask the RIPE NCC > to produce an impact/implementation report to add this new status > value and include the business rules to restrict it's use. We will > then seek a final approval from the community on the report. > > cheers > denis > co-chair DB-WG > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220405/4820e042/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]