[db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values

denis walker via db-wg wrote on 04/04/2022 13:38:
> If there are no objections to this, the co-chairs now ask the RIPE NCC
> to produce an impact/implementation report to add this new status
> value and include the business rules to restrict it's use.

Denis,

This came up in an email of yours from February:

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg//2022-February/007295.html

> The chairs make no recommendation on this item. But if there is no
> discussion we will simply mark NWI-4 as cancelled.

and here:

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg//2022-February/007314.html

> Is this a problem that you think needs to be solved? If 'yes' then we
> need to hear your thoughts. If 'no' then the chairs will cancel NWI-4
> and move on...

Was there any discussion about why this changed from: "not going to 
implement" to "going to implement"?

Separately, has there been any discussion about this new status value, 
"ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED PA"?  This is a significant change to the semantics 
of this key, and it's one which will cause breakage in the wild.

Nick