[db-wg] consensus on AS23456
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] consensus on AS23456
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon cleanup -- Current anomalies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Tue Jul 13 13:53:55 CEST 2021
Hi Ed, Thank you for the quick change :) -Cynthia On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:03 AM Edward Shryane via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hi Denis, Colleagues, > > I've added AS23456 as a reserved AS number to Whois. > > It's no longer possible to create a route(6) object with origin: AS23456, > now an error will be returned: > > ***Error: Cannot use reserved AS number 23456 > > There are no existing route(6) objects in RIPE or RIPE-NONAUTH with > origin: AS23456. > > Regards > Ed Shryane > RIPE NCC > > > > > On 12 Jul 2021, at 18:13, denis walker via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > > > Colleagues > > > > Whilst part of the discussion continues, there does seem to be a > > consensus on adding AS23456 to the reserved list maintained by the > > RIPE NCC. This would prevent anyone creating a ROUTE(6) object with > > AS23456 as the origin. > > > > The chairs also recognise the consensus to not delete or modify any > > set objects that reference AS23456. This is in line with past views > > not to purge set objects when an AUT-NUM object is deleted for any > > reason. > > > > The chairs therefore ask the RIPE NCC to add AS23456 to the RIPE > > Database reserved list. > > > > Regards > > William & denis > > co-chairs DB-WG > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210713/8f7695a4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] consensus on AS23456
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon cleanup -- Current anomalies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]