[db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jul 12 12:46:21 CEST 2021
Hi Ronald, > Do dues-paying members want to be underwriting the use of bogon ASNs by members whose ASN registrations have lapased due to non-payment of relevant annual fees? I feel like that is not what we are trying to discuss here and is outside our scope, maybe in the scope of AP-WG. (I don't know if this is in their scope though tbh) So could we please look at data for reserved ASNs (not unallocated ASNs) without trying to argue that any bogon is a bogon. If so we could have a much more productive discussion. -Cynthia On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 10:13 PM Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg < db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > In message <f77da251-97b8-8527-9ac6-cb06fc281255 at interall.co.il>, > Hank Nussbacher <hank at interall.co.il> wrote: > > >Thanks Ronald, but that doesn't answer my question. I was hoping to see > >route objects which reference *reserved* ASNs - not route objects for > >unallocated ASNs. > > Hank, I'm frankly not sure what the value of such a sub-list would be. > > A bogon ASN is a bogon ASN, no? > > Do dues-paying members want to be underwriting the use of bogon ASNs > by members whose ASN registrations have lapased due to non-payment of > relevant annual fees? > > > Regards, > rfg > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210712/289a3b61/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]