[db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Velder
lists at velder.li
Fri Jan 15 15:38:13 CET 2021
Hi there Update: Max gave me the tip that it is possible to force delete the existing route objects & re-create them with the own maintainer. This way it works to add another route object :-) Best regards Patrick On 15.01.21 14:33, Patrick Velder wrote: > Hi there > > It seems to be impossible to create route objects for inet(6)nums, if > there are other route objects to which your maintainer has no access. > > Even if you have mnt-by + mnt-routes on the inet(6)nums. > > Due to that, it's much more difficult to create new route objects for > our customers, as we have to contact the maintainer of all existing > objects in order to get mnt-by/mnt-routes on their route objects. > > In my opinion, that makes zero sense. If you have mnt-by/mnt-routes on > an inetnum, you should be able to create objects, regardless of > existing ones. > > Best regards > Patrick >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]