[db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jan 5 14:18:42 CET 2021
>> from draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds >> >> Any particular inetnum: object MAY have, at most, one geofeed >> reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when >> one is defined. >> >> now all we need is for the someone or someone's automated system to read >> the spec :) > > Of course the question is "what should happen in the bad case", eg. > what's the expected behaviour if there are 2 or more "remarks: > geofeed" attributes? > > Should the DB reject such an update? Should the geofeed client pick > one at random? Should it pick the first one? Or the last one? Or none? my personal opinion would be, as the spec says only one, an attempt to add a second should fail. as should an initial attempt to create with more than one. but i have faith that we can make it more complicated :) randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]