[db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Aug 18 14:35:01 CEST 2021
In message <20210818091626.GA1867 at hydra.ck.polsl.pl>, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: >On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:00:24AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote: > >> I have thus been surprised to see the following blocks listed separately >> as "allocated" in the daily "stats" file for RIPE. > >I have checked first few entries from the list below in >ftp://ftp.ripe.net:/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest and it >looks like these are assigned and not allocated. What stats are you >referring to? My apologies. A mere slip of the tongue on my part. I had intended to say "assigned"... not "allocated". >> 91.227.79.0/25 ripe >> 91.227.79.128/25 ripe > >ripencc|RU|ipv4|91.227.79.0|128|20110509|assigned >ripencc|RU|ipv4|91.227.79.128|128|20110915|assigned Regardless of the exact status, I remain perplexed to see blocks with prefix lengths greater than /24 in the daily RIPE stats file. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]