[db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aftab Siddiqui
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 13:30:18 CEST 2020
Just for my understanding, do you need a policy for the NCC to offer "whowas[1]" service? [1] https://www.apnic.net/static/whowas-ui/# Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:55, Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote on 22/09/2020 03:13: > > I'm not sure that the created date should be altered however when an > > existing block, legacy or otherwise, is simply shrunk, as appears > > to have happaned in this case. > > the better long-term fix might be to make network block history > available on the whois server. > > Nick > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20200922/c1054125/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] 57.224.0.0/11
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]