[db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9

Hi Cynthia,

The NRTM v4 initiative is in an awkward early stage where various
parties (with *no* obligations towards each other!) are attempting to
set the stage for the future existence of an inter-operable successor to
the NRTM v3 protocol. 

As indicated before, the nature of this call was informal, akin to a
hallway meeting at a conference. Decisions about the RIPE NCC database
are made on the db-wg at ipe.net mailing list. It was a courtesy to this
group to indicate some volunteers would have a call to help progress
things. You too were free to join. Hallway meetings are not recorded.

I'm interested to hear your opinions on-list or off-list! :-)

Kind regards,

Job

On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 10:36:43AM +0100, Cynthia Revström wrote:
> I would like to see more here on the mailing list, so I would request that
> any future calls be recorded and published.
> 
> I have opinions on this subject and I don't think me missing the call
> should leave me out of the loop.
> 
> - Cynthia
> 
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 11:31 Stavros Konstantaras <
> stavros.konstantaras at ams-ix.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Cynthia,
> >
> > Yes the call happened and the problem description is almost ready. Soon
> > will be published here in the mailing list so the DB-WG chairs can
> > officially create a new NWI and submit it to RIPE NCC developers
> >
> > Thank you for your support and your interest on that :)
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Stavros Konstantaras | Sr. Network Engineer | AMS-IX
> > M +31 (0) 620 89 51 04 | T +31 20 305 8999
> > ams-ix.net
> >
> > On 6 Nov 2020, at 02:51, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service.
> >
> > - Cynthia
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, <me at cynthia.re> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Job,
> >>
> >> Was there a call about this yet?
> >>
> >> And if so, was there any outcome?
> >>
> >> - Cynthia
> >>
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, <db-wg at ripe.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote:
> >>> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of
> >>> > NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem
> >>> > statement?
> >>>
> >>> Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject
> >>> so far... maybe Stavros, Emil, a DB-WG chair, myself and any other
> >>> interested parties can have a 1 hour group phone call to formulate an
> >>> updated problem statement for NWI-12?
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps next week, November 4th, 15:00 UTC? Consider it a "hallway
> >>> chat", not something formal. The chairs can report back to the mailing
> >>> list.
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>>
> >>> Job
> >>>
> >>>
> >