[db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Fri Nov 6 02:51:56 CET 2020
I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service. - Cynthia On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > Hi Job, > > Was there a call about this yet? > > And if so, was there any outcome? > > - Cynthia > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote: >> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of >> > NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem >> > statement? >> >> Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject >> so far... maybe Stavros, Emil, a DB-WG chair, myself and any other >> interested parties can have a 1 hour group phone call to formulate an >> updated problem statement for NWI-12? >> >> Perhaps next week, November 4th, 15:00 UTC? Consider it a "hallway >> chat", not something formal. The chairs can report back to the mailing >> list. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Job >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201106/4237494a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]