[db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois Release 1.99
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash.naderpour at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 14:15:13 CET 2020
Hi, I was one of the few opping NWI-10 as I had this feeling that it could create more issues than solving any major one. but I think there is no way to revert it, unless someone proposes a new one and goes through the same process? Regards, Arash On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:58 PM Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Apologies if this email is a bit impolite. > > From the start NWI-10 seemed like a pointless policy to me and just a > policy that was made because the db-wg wanted to make more policies. > > But as it has already messed up the data on my resources, I see it as a > policy that messes up data and wastes time for no real advantage. > > Hence I suggest that we revert NWI-10 unless someone actually has a good > reason for why the legal address needs to match the delegated file, and how > to implement it in a non-messy way. > > - Cynthia > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201208/7e5af357/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois Release 1.99
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]