[db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Dec 7 14:03:34 CET 2020
To clarify, when I said "messed up the data on my resources" I meant that the delegated file now has invalid data. And invalid data that is supposed to be correct is a lot worse than incorrect data that is just provided by the resource holder. - Cynthia On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > Apologies if this email is a bit impolite. > > From the start NWI-10 seemed like a pointless policy to me and just a > policy that was made because the db-wg wanted to make more policies. > > But as it has already messed up the data on my resources, I see it as a > policy that messes up data and wastes time for no real advantage. > > Hence I suggest that we revert NWI-10 unless someone actually has a good > reason for why the legal address needs to match the delegated file, and how > to implement it in a non-messy way. > > - Cynthia > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201207/57449b25/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]