[db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue May 28 13:30:13 CEST 2019
Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 28/05/2019 12:12: > Unfortunately, no cleanup was done when this rule was implemented, > but in recent times we try to do this. I will also contact the > maintainers of these route objects and ask them to fix the holes > attribute(s). I wonder if this key should be formally deprecated. It's used for 643 out of 302354 route: objects and 40 out of 28803 route6: objects, i.e. ~0.2% and 0.1% respectively. The complexity associated with handling it is substantial and most tools simply ignore it. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]