[db-wg] In-band notification mechanism?
Cynthia Revström me at cynthia.re
Sun Mar 24 10:58:16 CET 2019
Hi Job, I guess you have a point seeing as the non-realtime DB files are public without any paperwork. - Cynthia On 2019-03-24 10:46, Job Snijders wrote: > In order to provide the most value to RIPE NCC's members, I'd argue > that we need to remove ALL the paperwork e.g. allow any IP address to > set up a NRTM stream for the purpose of mirroring IRR objects that > contain routing information: route/route6/route-set/as-set. NTT is > mirroring the RIPE database at rr.ntt.net and we filter away anything > non-routing anyhow. > > The current NRTM agreement poses a significant barrier, the barrier > can be easily be circumvented; so it only causes harm. > > Having an agreement in place for IRR data that contains PII, > Organisation or any non-routing information is fine with me. That data > has no value in router configuration automation pipelines anyway. > > Kind regards, > > Job
[ db-wg Archives ]