[db-wg] --list-versions
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Tue Jun 25 23:59:13 CEST 2019
Hi, I would assume that is because for some reason netname is not unique, If you run whois -h whois.ripe.net CYNTHIA-V6-TEST -r You can see my point, 2 inet6num with the same netname. - Cynthia On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:47 PM Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg < db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > In message <90575aee-1245-9de6-86ac-417c3614d12c at fud.no>, > Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > > >* Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg > >> --list-versions 194.162.0.0 > >> --list-versions DE-ECOTEL-950515 > >> > >> I am having serious trouble understanding why this isn't working. > >> > >> If someone could explain, I'd appreciate it. > > > >a) Use an unambiguous primary/lookup key, e.g.: > > > >$ whois -h whois.ripe.net -- --list-versions 194.162.0.0/16 > > Ahhhhhhh! Thank you! This is the magic I was missing. And it makes > perfect sense, now that you say it. > > >b) «netname objects» don't exist, so no, not supposed to work. > > That comment makes no sense however. Those objects -do- exist in the > data base and a normal WHOIS query finds them. So I'm really still > not clear on why I can't apply --list-versions and --show-version to > them. > > > Regards, > rfg > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20190625/1a4ab4c0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]