[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Jul 29 19:40:25 CEST 2019
>> There are ways of flagging whether this process was carried out. One >> option would be to use a binary flag. Another would be to implement a >> datestamp for the last due diligence process carried out if it's not >> been set by the NCC. Lack of data could be flagged by either the >> absence of the parameter or else use 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z. > > less sure here. i can see wanting to differentiate between the two > classes of objects. not sure i care when they were last separated. > unless you expect things to change in time. if you have a better suggestion, go for it. My concern is mainly about having a deterministic way of figuring out which org objects have been subjected to due diligence and which haven't. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]