[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jul 29 17:31:47 CEST 2019
> the idea is that some org objects are created by users and inserted > into the ripe database while others are subject to due diligence by > the ripe ncc. I.e. there's a qualitative difference in data quality > between the two, but there is no way of distinguishing between them. aha! ok. i buy that. > There are ways of flagging whether this process was carried out. One > option would be to use a binary flag. Another would be to implement a > datestamp for the last due diligence process carried out if it's not > been set by the NCC. Lack of data could be flagged by either the > absence of the parameter or else use 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z. less sure here. i can see wanting to differentiate between the two classes of objects. not sure i care when they were last separated. unless you expect things to change in time. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]