[db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Sideline --template [was: Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jan 7 11:38:32 CET 2019
Just realized I made a mistake while writing the last message, ASNs without sponsoring-org attribute and without LEGACY status, and ORG that is of type other are unsponsored. Kind regards, Cynthia Revström On 2019-01-07 11:34, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: > Just an update: Laurens Hoogendoorn from the NCC contacted me and did > indeed confirm that ASNs without LEGACY status with an ORG that is > OTHER are indeed unsponsored, and that you can look at stat.ripe.net > historical whois to find out for how long. > > I do still think that it should be more obvious than this. > > Kind regards, > Cynthia Revström > > On 2019-01-07 10:57, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: >> So I have now run across several ASNs in which the org is of type >> "OTHER" yet there is no sponsoring-org, could this please be clarified? >> >> Example ASNs: AS200358, AS204842 >> >> If it is like I think it is, it must be that they have lost their >> sponsors but if that is the case, I would like to see a remark that >> is an "RIPE NCC managed value" saying something like "This ASN does >> not have any sponsor since YYYY-MM-DD". >> >> I am not entirely sure on this but something to clarify what is going >> on. >> >> Kind regards, >> Cynthia Revström >> >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Sideline --template [was: Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]