This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] remove bogon prefixes in the RIPE IRR NON-AUTH DB?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Status Update on NWI-5 Deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Tue Sep 4 12:46:58 CEST 2018
Dear WG,
I'd like to raise the issue of bogon prefixes in the RIPE IRR, and ask
RIPE NCC to remove all "bogon" route object registrations from the
"RIPE-NONAUTH" IRR database.
Today I was made aware of this example:
$ whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "-Troute6 2001:db8::/32" | egrep -v "%|^$"
route6: 2001:db8::/32
origin: AS25375
descr: AS25375
mnt-by: ch-stafag-1-mnt
mnt-by: LEUNET-SECURITY-MNT
created: 2018-08-25T15:27:50Z
last-modified: 2018-08-25T15:27:50Z
source: RIPE
I'd consider the following prefixes, and any more-specifics of these to
be bogons prefixes:
0.0.0.0/8 # RFC 1122 'this' network
10.0.0.0/8 # RFC 1918 private space
100.64.0.0/10 # RFC 6598 Carrier grade nat space
127.0.0.0/8 # RFC 1122 localhost
169.254.0.0/16 # RFC 3927 link local
172.16.0.0/12 # RFC 1918 private space
192.0.2.0/24 # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-1
192.168.0.0/16 # RFC 1918 private space
198.18.0.0/15 # RFC 2544 benchmarking
198.51.100.0/24 # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-2
203.0.113.0/24 # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-3
224.0.0.0/4 # Multicast
240.0.0.0/4 # Reserved
::/8 # RFC 4291 IPv4-compatible, loopback, et al
0100::/64 # RFC 6666 Discard-Only
2001:2::/48 # RFC 5180 BMWG
2001:10::/28 # RFC 4843 ORCHID
2001:db8::/32 # RFC 3849 documentation
3ffe::/16 # RFC 3701 old 6bone
fc00::/7 # RFC 4193 unique local unicast
fe80::/10 # RFC 4291 link local unicast
fec0::/10 # RFC 3879 old site local unicast
ff00::/8 # RFC 4291 multicast
Any route/route6 objects covered by the above prefixes should be deleted
from the database, and the software should be extended in such a way
that nobody can register new route/route6 objects covered by the above
list.
Kind regards,
Job
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Status Update on NWI-5 Deployment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]