[db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sandra Murphy
sandy at tislabs.com
Fri Jul 13 17:40:35 CEST 2018
So that’s the change I saw visible in the RIPE stat files at https://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/. Twitter has been announcing that space for years. I wonder if they’ll report what led them to start the announcements. —Sandy > On Jul 13, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Henriette Van Ingen via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear all, > > We would like to inform you that the RIPE NCC has de-registered 188.64.224.0/21 on 10 July 2018 according to our published procedures. We are in contact with the relevant party. > > Best Regards, > > Henriette van Ingen > Customer Services > RIPE NCC > > >> On 13 Jul 2018, at 11:54, denis walker via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Guys >> >> I am sure everyone will disagree with me, but this shows (to me) why it would be better to have one authoritative, accurate, trusted, distributed IRR managed by the 5 RIRs than many independent/commercial IRRs with non authenticated data. >> >> cheers >> denis >> co-chair DB-WG >> >> >> >> From: Aftab Siddiqui via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> >> To: Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> >> Cc: RIPE Database Working Group <db-wg at ripe.net> >> Sent: Thursday, 12 July 2018, 18:40 >> Subject: Re: [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE >> >> Hi Geoff, >> >> Of course Twitter is doing nothing uniquely unusual in this respect, as these are just 7 examples from a pool of some 300 announcements of unallocated address space (a list of such bogons can be found at http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Bogons) >> >> :) >> >> >> - Why is Twitter announcing these prefixes? >> >> I have no idea. Something has gone wrong here and the address has come back to the RIR and Twitter apper to be unaware of this. >> >> No, Twitter is absolutely aware of this issue, I alerted their NOC when I got the result this morning from CIDR report (yes, I scrop your data daily) but unfortunately there response was "This prefix is valid and owned by us in RIPE region. Please do your homework before making incorrect accusations." But atleast I tried. >> >> - How and why is this prefix in RADB, given that it is unallocated space? >> >> Good question - I wonder what periodic checks the RADB undertakes on the data held in its registry? >> >> No idea, it should be triggered right away when the RIR, who is the authentic source of these resources marked them "Unalloacted". But in a perfect world. >> >> - Why do upstream AS’s accept these advertised prefixes? >> >> Maybe they chose to believe that RADB performs robust periodic integrity checks? Or <insert reason here>? >> >> Yes, mostly follow RADB. >> >> >> Geoff >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Source GRS vs RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]