[db-wg] Fw: NWI-7: abuse-c implementation plan modification

My traditional response to any modification of the database:
As long as a notification that the objects were modified is sent, I have
no objections.


On 2017 Sep 27 (Wed) at 09:56:09 +0000 (+0000), denis walker via db-wg wrote:
:Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:44:42 +0000 (UTC)
:From: denis walker <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk>
:To: Database WG <db-wg at ripe.net>
:Subject: Fw: [db-wg] NWI-7: abuse-c implementation plan modification
:
:Colleagues
:
:
:I think the suggestion below from Tim is OK. There seems little point sending notifications to users about changes they don't need to take action on of data that is redundant. So if anyone has any strong objections please let us know by the end of this week. Otherwise we can give Tim the go ahead to this modification to the implementation plan.
:cheersdenisco-chair DB-WG
:
:      From: Tim Bruijnzeels via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net>
: To: "db-wg at ripe.net" <db-wg at ripe.net> 
: Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2017, 21:32
: Subject: Re: [db-wg] NWI-7: abuse-c implementation plan
:  
:Dear working group,
:
:We have a proposed timeline for the implementation. Let me quote the proposal sent out on 28 June here, and comment in-line:
:
:
:> 3) Clean up of “abuse-mailbox:” on PERSON (89k cases), MNTNER (2500 cases) and IRT (238 cases)
:> 
:> In these cases we propose to send a warning email to the holders of these objects with the following main message:
:> 
:> “The “abuse-mailbox:” is deprecated on these object and will be removed in 4 weeks, if you want to set up abuse contact information on your resource objects you can do so by having a default “abuse-c:” on your ORGANISATION referenced by your resource objects, or possibly overriding that default with a specific “abuse-c:” reference on applicable resource objects."
:> 
:> And then 4 weeks later we will preform the clean-up and refer back to this communication.
:
:On further reflection we would prefer to alter the plan, and just a single clean-up of these objects on Monday 30 October as well. This way the clean-up process will be consistent across all object types. Furthermore, there is no action to be taken on these objects and “abuse-mailbox:” on these objects is ignored in the Abuse Finder. In short there does not seem to be a strong motivation for bothering the holders of these objects twice.
: