[db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Sun Nov 12 15:28:44 CET 2017
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 at 15:17, Mark Prior via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to just change the definition of community in the > RPSL dictionary so that a community of <digit>+ ":" <digit>+ ":" > <digit>+ is valid and then have the tools either barf if they don't > understand or do "the right thing"? That would seem more consistent with > the current scheme where a community can either be an integer or > <digit>+ ":" <digit>+. That goes against the documented recommendations on how to upgrade RPSL. I assume a router that can deal with large communities will accept > standard ones in the same clauses if someone wants to do that for local > use only communities. Unfortunately your assumption is wrong. Kind regards, Job > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20171112/93e8b582/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]