[db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

* Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> [2017-01-17 12:51]:
> So, as I understand, the problem is either necessity to "create a lot of
> redundant objects" (as described by Gert Doering) or just a scale and
> automation (as described by you). None of this is beyond reasonable
> possibility to me. Although I can agree that both Gert and you are right
> with more detailed description of the problem and I'm ok with the
> problem description made in the original email.

Hello Piotr,

it seems it is not even possible to have different objects for
independent resources at the moment. To quote the NCC:

    We understand the reasoning for wanting to use two different org
    objects. However, we cannot use different org object IDs for the same
    enduser in resources assigned by the RIPE NCC and have to be strict
    about it.

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 581 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20170125/f44b6435/attachment.sig>