[db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Wiesinger
sebastian at karotte.org
Fri Jan 13 11:09:28 CET 2017
* ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk> [2017-01-12 13:51]: > Problem statement on "abuse-c:" implementation: > =============================================== [..] The problem statement looks good to me, I only would like to comment that the current way seems *too* complicated / bloated for a lot of people. So a solution should aim to be more "lightweight" for lack of a better word. That might happen naturally when tackling the problem statement but nontheless I would like to mention it. Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 581 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20170113/8563d50a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]