[db-wg] RIPE 73 DB-WG agenda V1
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE 73 DB-WG agenda V1
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE 73 DB-WG agenda V1 (and IRR Homing)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed Oct 26 15:19:08 CEST 2016
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:17:52PM +0200, denis wrote: Dear Denis > Have you forgotten about the almost million personal data sets that the > RIPE NCC locked and then asked the community to decide what to do next? I > wrote a detailed argument on why I believe this is a serious legal issue > some time ago, which not even the RIPE NCC answered: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-September/005318.html > > Bottom line, the RIPE NCC is both responsible for and liable for publishing > in a public database the personal details of almost a million people who > they have no relationship with, no knowledge of and no contact with. That > breaks data protection laws. They cannot hide behind being the 'data > controller' or the arguments made by the RIPE Data Protection Task Force > many years ago that this responsibility was delegated to the LIRs. If the > RIPE NCC's MNTNER object protects these PERSON objects, the RIPE NCC is > responsible and liable for this data. > > The objects should be reverted back to unmaintained and the operational > data that references them should be locked. That will force members to sort > the problem out themselves, after ignoring it for many years. I have not forget about this topic. It is going to be presented by Tim under point D in the agenda. All the best, Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE 73 DB-WG agenda V1
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE 73 DB-WG agenda V1 (and IRR Homing)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]