[db-wg] More-specific abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] More-specific abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] More-specific abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Nov 2 11:02:58 CET 2016
Hi, On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:53:35AM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > I would propose to fix this and add an abuse-c to resource objects > that would be "more specific" than the org abuse-c and overrides it. Please! The need to add extra org objects just to delegate abuse handling to other teams for specific networks has annoyed me from day one of abuse-c:, to the extent that I've just not done so. To repeat that: the current approach is so annoying that people that are *willing* to provide better abuse contact data shy away from doing so, because "why bother". Gert Doering -- speaking as a LIR tech-c and abuse-c -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20161102/ee33b7e0/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] More-specific abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] More-specific abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]