[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Mar 10 19:00:16 CET 2016
Hi, On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 06:50:52PM +0100, denis wrote: > Maybe we should talk about making admin-c and tech-c work like abuse-c. > That would be a step in the right direction. So you want to add millions of unmaintained organization: objects to the millions of unmaintained admin-c:/tech-c: references? Sounds like a very good plan to improve data quality! What?! (I wouldn't mind the hierarchical lookup capability that abuse-c: has, so "if an inetnum has no tech-c:, find the next less specific and use that", but the indirection via org and mandatory role is way too silly to be extended further. Maybe you should start *using* the database for a while, like, "work at an ISP", so you can see which ideas are just not practical from a user point of view?) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160310/7cb060e5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]