[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Mar 10 10:57:21 CET 2016
Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:36:48PM +0100, Horváth Ágoston János wrote: > It's not enough to state "let's add abuse-c here and here and here". > Also think about how one is supposed to return the abuse contact > afterwards. It should be algorithmically feasible to fetch the abuse > contact from the RIPE DB. Should inet(6)num take precedence? Should > the role object? or the organisation? or maybe a route? Or a > combination of these, with their parents involved? This is why I've detailed a possible and very well-defined search order in my proposal. > And one more thing. As far as data quality goes, users are not known > to keep their data up to date (sorry for the few exceptions - you're > not the rule). Then you will have to start to figure out which abuse-c > is outdated and which isn't; which one is still relevant and which is > not. That's NOT a database, that's a job for google. So, why is "require indirection via a organisation: and role: object" going to help with stale data? Except by making it so complicated that nobody is willingly going to use it to document abuse-handling exception for more specific subnets - in which case you've succeeded... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160310/9d644c3e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]