[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 7 20:29:42 CET 2016
Hi Niall On 07/03/2016 11:52, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On 7 Mar 2016, at 10:29, denis wrote: > >> Don't make emotive, vague comments like this....explain with facts. > > and a little further on: > >> When you work that one out they can apply the same principle to >> "abuse-c:". Problem solved... Not at all. the rest of the paragraph you edited out were the facts in this case. cheers denis > > Pot, kettle, etc. > /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]