[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 13:36:04 CET 2016
On 07-Mar-2016, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects > - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: […] I’m actually +1 with these. And in fact even with the current spec there isn’t anything that says a person object can’t be abuse-c - though an outfit of any significant size might prefer to add a role account just so that multiple people can receive and handle abuse complaints. —srs
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]