[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 3 11:55:57 CET 2016
On 03/03/2016 11:49, Randy Bush wrote: >> In these days of political interest in how the internet is 'managed' the >> RIRs need to do more than 'just maintain an accurate registry'. The >> internet is a crucial part of modern life. Abuse is considered to be a >> serious problem. What you are saying is that you don't give a dam about >> abuse and are not interested in being part of the management of abuse. >> The more people who hold and publish this view, the more likely >> politicians are to get involved. > > your characterization of my argument is egregiously false. > > and i would rather govt regulation than regulation by a bunch of amateur > policy weenies. at least i get to vote on the former and have courts. I was not aware that the UN was elected :) cheers denis > > but i have nothing new to say and a plane to catch. enjoy. > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]