[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 3 04:14:18 CET 2016
On 03/03/2016 01:44, Randy Bush wrote: >> If you put an address that does not handle abuse in abuse-c: you >> have just inserted incorrect data into the database. IMO that >> should not be the job of the NCC... > > if you force folk to put in abuse-c, there will be non-responsive > email addresses. get over it. As long as you know it is the email address intended to receive abuse complaints, if there is no response that in itself is a statement from the network manager. cheers denis >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]