[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Mar 1 11:17:50 CET 2016
denis wrote: > There is nothing special about legacy resources or legacy resource > holders. They are IP addresses just like all the others. [...] From a > moral, ethical and community point of view there should be no > difference in the way either is treated. These are good principals. I support 2016-01 for these reasons and because the abuse-c mechanism, while not perfect, is a good deal better than not having it. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]