[db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
dbwg at c4inet.net
Thu Jan 28 15:45:42 CET 2016
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:03:49PM +0100, Andreas Worbs wrote: >hand "org:" is optional at the moment and not everybody had set up an >"org:". So after a forced deleting of "netname:" it is possible that you >don't have an information in the WHOIS to which customer the subnet >belongs to. AIUI, this affects only allocation and independent resource assignment objects. An object of this type without an "org:" field should not exist (Tim, correct me if I'm wrong). For customer assignments, the "netname:" is filled in by the LIR and it's a freeform string so not a mandatory format. >can consider if they want to delete "netname:" themselves or perhaps >through RIPE. Don't know if it's possible to set up an option in the LIR >portal and the LIR can set a flag until DD-MM-YYYY if RIPE shall >clean-up their netname attributes. That's nearly the worst option, it would lead to an inconsistent format for these objects, some with "netname:", some without... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]