[db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

denis ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jan 28 01:30:04 CET 2016

Hi Tim

On 27/01/2016 17:27, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> This is our preferred option because not having
> duplicate possibly inconsistent data will improve data quality and
> reduce work.
>


This is EXACTLY the reason why it is a bad idea to enforce the addition 
of "abuse-c:" in ORGANISATION objects where it is not needed. You are 
forcing the addition of duplicate, possibly inconsistent data. Please be 
consistent in your approach.

cheers
denis

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]