[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jerry Upton
jerry1upton at aol.com
Mon Feb 29 21:51:23 CET 2016
+2 Jerry Upton Executive Director M3AAWG.org -----Original Message----- From: Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com>; Ruediger Volk <rv at NIC.DTAG.DE> Cc: aa-wg-chairs <aa-wg-chairs at ripe.net>; db-wg-chairs <db-wg-chairs at ripe.net>; db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net>; anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Mon, Feb 29, 2016 9:10 am Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01 On 2/29/2016 3:09 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On 29-Feb-2016, at 12:08 AM, Ruediger Volk <rv at NIC.DTAG.DE> wrote: >> We have to assume that Internet number resource holders requested >> to establish abuse-c >> - usually are NOT focussed an abuse handling (different core business:-) > > With all due respect - assume that the number resource holder is a corporation engaged in, for example, brewing beer. ... > Wouldn’t they have a corporate IT team tasked with looking at compromises on their network that are causing abuse / DDoS issues ... > With abuse-c an external reporter can reach out to the appropriate team, ... +1 d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160229/1c4704b2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]