[db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Aug 16 06:36:54 CEST 2016
>> When the AFRINIC IRR was initially launched, we already did do some of >> that. But not enough resources holders saw enough of a motivation to >> make the effort. Hopefully this initiative will also help to motivate >> some number more. But it’s never going to be all. > > In my opinion the route-objects should've been moved back in the day > during the AfriTrans project when all the inet{,6}num's were moved by > the RIRs. But alas, that didnt happen so now we need to deal with it. > > I don't think it is wise to leave it up to thousands of resource holders > to perform actions, maybe some of them don't even realise their objects > are in the RIPE DB instead of AfriNIC. > > I don't consider "let the resource holders do it" a viable solution to > address the problem statement. in the ripe address space, a lot of resource holders have not aggregated route: objects, though we have asked many times. the ncc should aggregate them. "let the resource holders do it" is clearly not a viable solution. the IRR is a service run FOR the resource holders, not AT the resource holders. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]