[db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 19 13:43:11 CEST 2016
Hi, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:54:35PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > I think that if there is a last-modified field, it should always be > accurate. And, since the objects were modified, that should have > updated the fields. > > I'm torn on the notify emails, though. I can see they would create an > immense amount of support tickets, but on the other hand, as a producer > of db objects I want to know what changed in my objects _especially_ when > I didn't change them myself. This. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160419/2bdb9ba5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]