[db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Fri Apr 8 14:00:53 CEST 2016
Peter Koch writes: > From a data protection perspective, you don't need a reason to delete, you'd > need a reason to keep, so the "hurry" starts as soon as the last reference > is revoked. Is there a substantive risk? Maybe not. I'd still like > to understand what purpose that six months period is supposed to serve. > The last time I looked (10 years or so ago) the Ducth law/guidelines(?) stated that date should be removed 5 years after it doesn't has any function. I think one can find that at something like <https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl>. jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]