[db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database

On 07/04/2016 11:23, Trudy Prins wrote:

Can you detail what attempt was performed to try to contact the person
or role object? 

Thanks,
Hank

>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> The RIPE NCC Executive Board (EB) endorsed a proposal on how to deal
> with a vulnerability for RIPE Database users. Following their advice,
> the RIPE NCC proactively locked 848,986 unmaintained PERSON objects
> and 1,206 unmaintained ROLE objects on 6 April 2016.
>
> Since reaching the last /8, IPv4 address space has become more
> susceptible to hijacking. Unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects are
> highly at risk of being found and hijacked. In addition, unmaintained
> PERSON and ROLE objects are an issue with regards to data protection
> obligations.
>
> The potential impact of abuse led us to consult with the EB on this
> intermediary solution before engaging with the community on the next
> steps. Exposing this issue without taking adequate measures would have
> left the RIPE NCC liable to third party damages.
>
> The proposed solution we outline below is a starting point, to be
> discussed by the community.
>
>
> Background:
> ===========
>
> Since 2010 it has been mandatory to protect PERSON and ROLE objects in
> the RIPE Database using a maintainer on "mnt-by:". A large number of
> PERSON and ROLE objects dating from before 2010 are still not
> protected in this way.
>
> Objects can be created that reference these unmaintained objects, but
> doing so will generate a warning.
>
> In recent years, given the scarcity of IPv4 address space, there is a
> higher risk of people searching for unmaintained PERSON or ROLE
> objects in order to pose as a resource holder to sell IPv4 space. In
> the case of legacy space, this could take place outside the view of
> the RIPE NCC if the address space is not registered with the RIPE NCC.
>
>
> Proposal:
> =========
>
> 1) All unmaintained ROLE and PERSON objects are now locked. As the
> RIPE NCC will not be able to correctly check all claims on
> unmaintained database objects, unlocking is not available. Offering to
> unlock these objects could leave the RIPE NCC liable to third party
> damages if due diligence is not followed.
>
> 2) Furthermore, the RIPE NCC modifies the existing warning about
> referencing unmaintained persons/roles to a similar warning about
> referencing locked persons/roles.
>
> 3a) The locked objects can remain as they are. In time, all locked
> PERSON or ROLE objects no longer referenced by other objects could be
> automatically deleted: the current thinking is a 180-day deletion
> timeout for these locked, unreferenced objects.
>
> 3b) If there is an operational need, new PERSON or ROLE objects should
> be created by the object owners. This solution puts control back into
> the hands of the object owners. The user can follow the existing
> process for creating and referencing new objects.
> If there is a use case for supporting bulk migrations where a
> reference to a locked PERSON or ROLE object should be replaced, the
> RIPE NCC can create a wizard in the RIPE Database webupdates section
> of www.ripe.net <http://www.ripe.net>.
>
> We look forward to your feedback.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Trudy Prins
> Manager Software Engineering
> RIPE NCC
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160407/e70f0bf8/attachment.html>