[db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Thu Oct 22 19:02:23 CEST 2015
On 21/10/2015 15:32, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > Provided that the working group agrees with this, we expect this can be > done in the space of a few weeks after the business rule is > implemented. sounds good (i.e. +1). Could you send 3M/1M/1W notifications of the removal and the consequences of the object being locked? Locking has operational implications and a bunch of people got hit with problems due to the mntner md5 locking issue a couple of months ago. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]